Would Patton or Montgomery be effective battlefield commanders in the twenty-first century? Does the changing character of warfare drive transformations in the ways in which senior officers exercise command of their formations? What explains the change from command as a traditionally individual endeavor to something that is best described as “collective command”?
Dr. Anthony King joins this episode of the MWI Podcast to discuss these and other questions. Dr. King is Chair of War Studies in the Politics and International Studies Department at Warwick University in the United Kingdom. He is also the author of a new book called Command: The Twenty-First-Century General. As he discusses his book during the conversation, he describes the exercise of command as something that changes over time—something that looks substantially different today than it did for much of the twentieth century.
You can hear the full episode below, and if you aren’t already subscribed to the MWI Podcast, be sure to find it on iTunes, Stitcher, or your favorite podcast app so you don’t miss an episode!
Image credit: Sgt. Michelle U. Blesam, US Army
Great Job with the interview, Mission Accomplishment is the purpose, Don’t think there is a checklist or “a way “ to make that happen in fight against a near peer competitor. The commander must create a command team that accomplish the mission with him / her or without their presence . Again no absolutes ! Warriors today are blessed with these discussions available on line . Thanks