Michael O’Hanlon, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, spoke to cadets about the future scenarios they are likely to face in battle. He dismissed notions that future wars will be mostly conventional and said that “messy” stability operations are not going away anytime soon. “Your predecessors,” he told cadets, “preferred closing-and-killing-the-enemy kind of missions, not complex missions,” adding that “looking at the history of the planet, we have to be ready for messy conflicts.” O’Hanlon is the author of the new book, The Future of Land Warfare,” in which he lays out ten scenarios – from an outbreak of war on the Korean peninsula to a conflict between India and Pakistan – that might necessitate the deployment of American land power.
The articles and other content which appear on the Modern War Institute website are unofficial expressions of opinion. The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not reflect the official position of the United States Military Academy, Department of the Army, or Department of Defense.
The Modern War Institute does not screen articles to fit a particular editorial agenda, nor endorse or advocate material that is published. Rather, the Modern War Institute provides a forum for professionals to share opinions and cultivate ideas. Comments will be moderated before posting to ensure logical, professional, and courteous application to article content.
Most Popular Posts
- Not Your Grandfather’s Resistance: The Unavoidable Truths about Small States’ Best Defense Against Aggression
- The Limits of Logic: Why Narrative Thinking is Better Suited to the Demands of Modern Combat
- Escalation to Nuclear War in the Digital Age: Risk of Inadvertent Escalation in the Emerging Information Ecosystem